第二种意义社会必要劳动价值论再质疑  

Re_querying the Second Meaning of Social Essential Labor Value Theory

作　　者：陈振羽[1] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学

出　　处：《广西师院学报（哲学社会科学版）》2001年第1期18-23,共6页Guangxi Teachers College Journal（Edition of Philosophy and Social Sciences）

摘　　要：第二种意义社会必要劳动价值论者一个错误是 ,认为在商品经济只有通过交换 ,　第二种意义社会必要劳动价值论再质疑产品才转变为商品 ,劳动才形成价值。它们忽视了马克思把《资本论》建立在唯物史观的基础上由此得出的社会经济生活过程中生产决定交换的原理 ,从而科学区分价值生产和价值实现。他们另一个错误是 ,认为抽象劳动并不绝对否定劳动的效用。他们误解了马克思的劳动二重性学说 。One mistake of people insisting in the second meaning of social essential labor value theory is that exchanging is the only way to make production change to commodity in a market economy.They neglect that Marx based “Capital” on historical materialism then leading to the principle that production decides exchange in the process of social economic life,and then it scientifically distinguishes value production from value realization.Another mistake is that they think the abstract labor doesn't deny the utility of labor absolutely,they misunderstand Max' theory of dual nature of labor and some other theories.

关 键 词：社会必要劳动 价值生产 劳动二重性学说 抽象劳动 马克思 《资本论》 商品 学区 错误 质疑 

分 类 号：G633[文化科学—教育学] F014[经济管理—政治经济学]