世界卫生组织生活质量-100量表在脊髓损伤人群生活质量评价中的信度和效度  

Reliability and validity of the WHO Quality of Life-100 instrument in persons with spinal cord injury

作　　者：孙知寒[1] 马洪路[1] 王莲屏[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国康复研究中心博爱医院社会职业康复科,北京市100068

出　　处：《中国临床康复》2005年第5期33-35,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation

摘　　要：目的:评价世界卫生组织生活质量-100(WHOQOL-100)量表在中国脊髓损伤人群中应用的信度、效度。方法:对1989-01/2002-12在中国康复研究中心进行过康复的386例脊髓损伤患者进行信访方式的问卷调查。采用内在一致性信度Cronbach'sα系数和劈半信度系数分析量表的信度,用因子分析来评价量表的结构效度。结果:回收有效问卷209份。Cronbach'sα系数除生理领域外,在量表的6个领域均高于0.75,而劈半信度系数为0.8360。因子分析显示提取的4个公因子,可解释总方差的64.65%。脊髓损伤者与一般人群在量表的所有领域和22个方面的得分差异有显著性意义。结论:使用WHOQOL-100量表评价脊髓损伤人群的生活质量是有效而可靠的。AIM:To evaluate the reliability and validity of the WHO Quality of Life 100(WHOQOL 100) in persons with spinal cord injury(SCI) in China. METHODS:Questionnaires were mailed to 386 individuals with SCI,who were discharged from China Rehabilitation Research Center from January 1989 to December 2002.The reliability of the WHOQOL 100 scores was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and split half coefficients.The structural validity of the scores was evaluated using factor analysis. RESULTS:The results were based on 209 persons with SCI who returned the complete questionnaires.Cronbach's alpha coefficients were above 0.75 in all the domains except the physical domain,and split half coefficient was 0.836 0.Factor analysis showed that there were four common factors,which explained 64.65%of the total variance.There were significant differences between the scores of persons with SCI and general population in all domains and all facets except two. CONCLUSION:The WHOQOL 100 instrument provides valid and reliable data for the assessment of quality of life in persons with SCI.

关 键 词：脊髓损伤 生活质量 信度 效度 

分 类 号：R74[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]