检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]同济大学土木工程防灾国家重点实验室,上海200092
出 处:《地震工程与工程振动》2004年第6期32-38,共7页Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(50025821);创新研究群体基金项目(50321803)
摘 要:本文应用模态静力非线性分析方法,对多个算例进行了静力非线性分析。比较分析了不同振型组合对计算精度的影响,对模态选择的参数进行了研究,提出采用模态质量参与系数进行模态选择的控制,为模态静力非线性分析方法的推广使用提供参考。另外,分析了结构基本周期对该方法计算精度的影响。Using the method of modal pushover analysis (MPA), a lot of examples were calculated in the paper to build up the relationship between the effective modal mass participation ratio and the displacement calculation errors with the increase of the including vibration modes. And the influence of the natural period on the computation accuracy was also analyzed. It is shown that the satisfying results can be obtained only if effective modal mass participation ratio is greater than 0.8, which set up the criterion of mode selection in MPA. Moreover, natural period of the structure has a great influence on the calculation results of nonlinear static procedure. As to long period structures, especially when the natural period of structure is close to the predominant period of ground motion, errors may become very drastic if only low order modes are considered and thus higher modes should be involved in the analysis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.80