关于选择行政诉讼的审查形式:完全审查的思考  

The Examination Form of Administrative Litigation: Complete Examination

作　　者：解志勇[1] 于鹏[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学,北京100101 [2]山东经济学院,济南250014

出　　处：《天津行政学院学报》2005年第1期77-80,共4页Journal of Tianjin Administration Institute

摘　　要：我国学者和实务界对行政诉讼审查形式的选择,存在争论。从历史和比较的角度分析,从行政诉讼实践的需要来看,我国应该选择既有法律审查又有事实审查的完全审查模式。这不但符合行政诉讼实践的需要,也有利于实现行政诉讼的目标。The scholars and practical circle in our country dispute about the choice of examination form of administrative litigation. From the historical and comparative points of view, as well as from the need of practices in administrative litigation, our country should choose the mode of complete examination including both judicial examination and de facto examination. Such practice will not only accord with the need of practice in administrative litigation, but also help to realize the goal of administrative litigation.

关 键 词：审查形式 法律审 事实审 完全审查 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]