检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨义明[1] 王科杰[2] 黄金生 张水兰[1] 李旭[1]
机构地区:[1]河南大学第一附属医院肿瘤科,开封475001 [2]开封市第二人民医院肿瘤科,河南475002 [3]开封市第一人民医院肿瘤科,河南475001
出 处:《临床肿瘤学杂志》2004年第6期610-612,共3页Chinese Clinical Oncology
摘 要:目的 :探讨鬼臼噻吩甙 (VM 2 6 )、顺铂 (PDD)和氟脲嘧啶 (5 Fu)组成的VPF方案治疗晚期胃癌的近期疗效和毒副反应。方法 :将 1998年 6月至 2 0 0 2年 5月收治的 134例晚期胃癌患者 ,随机分为VPF组和由VP 16、CF及 5 Fu联合的ELF方案组各 6 7例进行化疗 ,二个周期后按WHO标准评定效果。结果 :VPF组有效率为 71 6 % (4 8/6 7) ,ELF组有效率为5 0 7% (34/6 7) ,VPF组有效率高于ELF组 ,两组差异有显著性 (P <0 0 5 )。两组毒副反应主要是轻中度的骨髓抑制、厌食、恶心呕吐及脱发等 ,患者可以耐受。结论 :VPF方案治疗晚期胃癌的近期疗效较好 ,有效率高于ELF方案 ,毒副反应可以耐受 。Objective:To observe the short-term response and side effect of VPF (VM-26+PDD+5-Fu) on advanced gastric carcinoma.Methods:134 patients with advanced gastric carcinomas from June 1998 to May 2002 were randomized into two groups(each was 67), group one was treated with VPF and group two with ELF(VP-16+CF+5-Fu), responses were evaluated after two therapeutic period.Results:The effective rate for VPF and ELF was 71.6%(48/67) and 50.7(34/67) respectively and the difference between two groups was significant(P<0.05). The main side effects of two groups were depression of bone marrow, nausea, vomiting and alopecia et al and might be mild and tolerable.Conclusion:The short-term therapeutic effect of VPF is better than ELF and their side effects were similar and tolerable. The treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma with VPF is a useful method.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117