检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何秉贞[1] 张成飞[1] 丁瑞宇[1] 林琼光[1]
出 处:《华西口腔医学杂志》2004年第6期474-476,共3页West China Journal of Stomatology
摘 要:目的 比较Resosolv和氯仿再通塑化后根管的能力。方法 4 0颗离体牙 (80个根管 )经FR酚醛树脂塑化后随机分成 4组 ,每组 2 0个根管。A组 :K型锉和Resosolv去除根管内塑化物 ;B组 :K型锉和氯仿去除根管内塑化物 ;C组 :超声K型锉和Resosolv去除根管内塑化物 ;D组 :超声K型锉和氯仿去除根管内塑化物。记录根管通畅的个数、操作时间和工作长度丧失情况。结果 Resosolv溶解根管内塑化物的能力明显优于氯仿 ,Resosolv辅助能通畅 87 5 %的根管 ,而氯仿辅助仅能通畅 4 5 0 %的根管。结论 Resosolv是有效的根管内塑化物的辅助溶剂。Objective To evaluate the possibility for removal of resinifying agent, time required for removal and the working length loss by Resosolv or Chloroform.Methods 40 human teeth (80 root canals) obturated with FR phenolaldehyde agent were divided into four groups, 20 root canals per group. Group A: Resosolv with K file; group B: chloroform with K file; group C: Resosolv with Ultrasonic K file; group D: Chloroform with ultrasonic K file. Calculating the percentage for removal of resinifying agent, time required for removal and the working length loss.Results The effectiveness of Resosolv for removing resinifying agent was better than chloroform. 87.5% of canals could be negotiated by Resosolv; 45% of canals be negotiated by chloroform.Conclusion Resosolv is an effective solvent for canals obturated with resinifying agent.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229