检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江大学医学院附属妇产科医院麻醉科,杭州市310006 [2]浙江大学医学院附属妇产科医院护理部,杭州市310006
出 处:《中华护理杂志》2005年第2期87-89,共3页Chinese Journal of Nursing
基 金:浙江省卫生厅科研基金资助项目;2004B132
摘 要:目的评价以护士为基础、以麻醉医师为督导的疼痛管理模式(NBASAPS)在临床术后疼痛管理中应用的成效。方法对实施该疼痛管理模式前后的788例术后病人进行开放性、前瞻性、非随机的观察性研究,分为两组,即实施APS前组(388例)和实施APS后组(400例)。观察镇痛效果。结果与实施APS前组比较,实施APS后组的术后镇痛效果指标(VAS值)显著降低(P<0.01);术后24h和48h的睡眠时间显著增加(P<0.01);住院时间显著缩短(P<0.01);病人总体满意度显著提高(P<0.01)。结论实施以护士为基础、以麻醉医师为督导的术后疼痛管理模式能显著提高术后镇痛效果。Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of the nurse-based, anesthesiologist-supervised pain management model used in postoperative pain management.Methods 388 patients in the Pre-APS inception phase and 400 patients in the Post-APS inception phase were enrolled in an open, prospective, nonrandom,observational study.Results Compared with the Pre-APS Group,Post-APS's mean VAS was significant lower (P<0.01);Sleeping time within 24h after the operation was longer and the same within 48h(P<0.01); Hospitalization time was shorter than Pre-APS Group (P<0.01); patients satisfaction rate was higher in the Post-APS Group.Conclusion Nurse-based, anesthesiologist-supervised pain management model is a significant improvement in postoperative analgesia.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222