从不完美交际语到完美思维语的句法推导  

The imperfection of language in communication and the perfection of language in thinking

作　　者：宁春岩[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南大学语言学系

出　　处：《当代语言学》2002年第2期138-143,137,共7页Contemporary Linguistics

摘　　要：Chomsky(1998,1999)提出了关于语言用于交际时是不完美的,而用于思维时是完美的看法,认为句法操作的根本任务是从具体语言交际使用中不完美的外在结构形态,推导出在思维中表现出来的完美可用的、为人类共有的内在语义结构形态。本文接受Chomsky这种看法,按照“最简方案”的立论原则,联系英语和汉语中的语义无解特征和错位现象,认为配伍和移动虽然都是从不完美的交际语到完美的思维语推导的句法操作,但是两个之间有本质上的不同,因此有必要对此加以区分:前者为语义无解特征所驱动,而后者为表示体貌的功能词项T所驱动。In Chomsky (1998, 1999), the problem of imperfection of language in communication vs. perfection of language for thinking is formulated as the guideline for the design of linguistic theories. Under this guideline and in accord with the theorization principles laid out in the Minimalist Program, the present study makes a distinction between Agree and Move. It argues that the former is motivated by uninterpretable features whereas the latter by the aspect feature of T, on the basis of a brief observation of dislocation and uninterpretable features displayed in English and Chinese.

关 键 词：句法 维语 交际 语义结构 功能词 最简方案 汉语 根本任务 看法 本质 

分 类 号：H043[语言文字—语言学]