辩证法内部的争论:阿多诺和《历史与阶级意识》  

作　　者：张亮[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学哲学系

出　　处：《江海学刊》2001年第5期104-110,共7页Jianghai Academic Journal

摘　　要：本文着重探讨了阿多诺与青年卢卡奇的《历史与阶级意识》的 关系问题，认为后者为前者的“否定的辩证法”的形成和发展提供了最重要的理论基础，但 由于两者在理解物化问题上的差异，导致前者最终走向后者的反面，提出要以“否定的辩证 法”来反对总体性辩证法。这种反对的本质不是要放弃理性、遁入艺术，而是要以艺术为理 性祛魅。This paper emphatically probes into the relat ion between Adorno and yo ung Lukács' History and Class Consciousness, then points out that the latter pr ovided the most important theoretic base for the formation and development of Ad orno's “negative dialectics”, because of the difference on understanding reifi c ation, Adorno at last moved towards the opposite of the latter and wished to fig h t total dialectic with “negative dialectics”. The essence of the fight is not to abandon reason and select art in order to escape reality, but to disenchant r eason with art.

关 键 词：物化 否定的辩证法 同一性 总体性 总体性辩证法 

分 类 号：B17[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]