检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑丁足[1]
机构地区:[1]湘潭大学,湖南湘潭411105
出 处:《政治与法律》2002年第5期105-108,共4页Political Science and Law
摘 要:本文针对当前理论界主张我国应移植辩诉交易这一观点,指出辩诉交易是美国一系列具体的法律制度造就的无奈的选择,是美国法律文化中公权力处理方式私权化、刑事权力处理方式民事化的一种极端表现,以及辩诉交易面对其本身产生的弊端也无可奈何,并进而提出我们在吸收其“提高诉讼效率”合理内核的同时,对其程序的构造及其运作应于以驳斥。The theoretical circles suggest that our country should transplant the system of plea bargaining.This article analyses that the system of plea bargaining is no alternative choice by a se-ries of legal system in America.It is the maximum expression that public right is handled in the way in which the private right is handled and that criminal power tends to civil right ,and they have no choice when the system of plea bargaining faces the malpractice in itself.Finally the article put forward the view that we should refute the structure and operation of its procedure when we assimi-late its rational kernel of raising litigation efficient.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.168