可疑青光眼的中心阈值视野改变观察分析  

Observation and Analysis on the Change of the Centric Threshold Perimetry of the Doubtful Glaucoma

作　　者：林翔[1] 李瑞庄[1] 谷艳华[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东医学院附属医院眼科,广东湛江524001

出　　处：《河北医学》2005年第2期101-103,共3页Hebei Medicine

摘　　要：目的:探讨发生青光眼危险因素与中心阈值视野改变的关系。方法:500(980眼)例可疑青光眼按危险因素分组,分别采用日本TopconSBP2020自动视野SDT340程序检测中心30°阈值视野。结果:混合组、异常杯盘比组、高眼压组、症状组中心视野损害率分别为70%、48.3%、47.5%、35.8%,混合组与其他三组比较差异显著(P<0.05);近视性屈光不正患者与远视性屈光不正阈值视野损害比较差异显著(P<0.01);各年龄段中心阈值视野损害比较无差异(P>0.05)。结论:可疑青光眼近视性屈光不正患者比远视性屈光不正患者中心阈值视野损害多;眼压增高伴有视乳头改变是发生视野损害的主要危险因素。Objective: Discussing the relation between the dangerous factors of glaucoma and the change of the centric threshold perimetry. Method: 500 cases (980 eyes) doubtful glaucoma are divided into groups based on their dangerous factors, respectively through TopconSBP2020 auto-visual field from Japan and 30° threshold perimetry of SDT340 program test center. Result: The centric visual-field damaging rates of the mixed group, the abnormal cup-tray group, high eye pressure group and symptom group are 70%, 48.3%, 47.5%, 35.8% respectively. Comparing with the other three groups, the difference of the mixedgroup is remarkable (P<0.05). The difference in the visual field damage of threshold between the nearsighted patients with incorrect phototropism and the farsighted ones with incorrect phototropism is remarkable (P<0.01). The damage of the centric threshold perimetry among different ages has no difference (P>0.05). Conclusion: The damage of the centric threshold perimetry of the nearsighted patients with incorrect phototropism of doubtful glaucoma is greater than the farsighted ones with incorrect phototropism. It is the dangerous factor to cause the damage of visual field that the eye pressure is growing higher with change of visible nipple.

关 键 词：青光眼 可疑 阅值视野 危险因素 

分 类 号：R775[医药卫生—眼科]