检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙佩[1]
机构地区:[1]大连市第三人民医院放疗科,辽宁大连116033
出 处:《医疗装备》2005年第3期51-52,共2页Medical Equipment
摘 要:目的 :探讨影响软腭癌放射治疗的预后因素。方法 :1990年 1月至 1999年 7月我科收治的软腭癌患者 90例 ,男性 63例 ,女性 2 7例。鳞癌 48例 ,低分化癌 2 2例 ,未分化癌 12例 ,腺癌 8例。采用直线加速器外照射 ,照射剂量 60~ 70GY/6~ 7W。用Kaplan -Meier法计算生存率和局部控制率 ,Logrank法做差异检验 ,Cox回归法统计影响局部控制率 (LC)和总生存率 (OS)的预后因素。结果 :中位随访时间 5 7个月 (5个月~ 114个月 )。 5年总生存率分别为 44 4%。 5年局部控制率为 44 3 % 19例在随访过程中出现局部复发 (10例为原发部位复发 ,8例为颈部淋巴结复发 ,1例因失访复发部位不详 ) ,16例出现远处转移。结论 :T N分期 ,病理类型 ,疗终时肿瘤有无残存是影响软腭癌放射治疗疗效的主要因素。Objective To analyze the prognostic factors of soft palate cancer treated with definitive radiotheraphy Methods from 1990~1999,90 patients(63 male,27 female),12 no-differentiated carcinoma,22 poorly differentiated carcinoma,48 squama,8 adenocarcinoma they were treated with radiotheraphy to a dose of 60~70GY Loco-regional control(LC)and overall survival(OS)rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method Logrank and Cox regression analyses were used to identify the prognostic factors Results The median follow-up time was 57months(range,5~114 months) The 3-and 5-years OS rates were and The 5-years LC rate was 31 patients developed recurrent disease(18l ocally,12 in cervical lymph nodes,1 lost to follow-up),15 patientshavetransferedto distans Conclusions Our analysis shows that the stage of desease,typeofpathologeandtumorresidual after radiotheraphy may have influence on the prognosis of soft palate cancer treated with definitive radiotherophy
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15