认知行为取向危机干预的效果及影响因素  

Effect of crisis intervention on cognitive-behavior oriented and the influencing factors

作　　者：李靖[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学心理学系,北京100871

出　　处：《中国行为医学科学》2005年第3期265-267,共3页Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science

摘　　要：目的 考察认知 行为取向的危机干预的效果及其影响因素。方法 在危机干预前后,采用SCL -90、状态 特质焦虑问卷、幸福感指数量表以及中国人人格形容词评定量表对 126名参与者进行测量。结果 干预后,参与者SCL 90总分 (P<0. 001)、躯体化 (P<0. 013 )、人际敏感 (P=0. 015 )、焦虑 (P<0. 001)、恐怖(P<0. 001)4项因子分与状态焦虑分数(P=0. 011)显著降低,幸福感指数 (P<0. 013)显著升高;这些变化与参与者的人格因素显著相关,并可以由人口统计学与工作变量有效解释,年龄与教育水平可以共同解释SCL- 90总分变化(26 8% )的变异,SCL 90焦虑变化 (25 2% )的变异,年龄与教育水平可以共同解释SCL 90总分变化(26 8% )的变异,SCL- 90焦虑变化(25 2% )的变异。结论 此项危机干预有效,其效果受到参与者人格因素、人口统计学以及工作变量的影响。ObjectiveTo study the effect of a cognitive-behavior oriented crisis intervention (CI) and the effect-related factors. Methods126 employees under crisis were assessed by SCL-90, STAI, Index of Well-Being, Index of General Affect, and an indigenously developed personality scale before and after the CI was implemented. ResultsSCL-90 total score (t=4.196, P<0.001), somatization (t=2.518, P<0.013), interpersonal sensitivity (t=2.470, P=0.015), anxiety (t=8.215, P<0.001), phobic anxiety (t=3.686, P< 0.001), and state anxiety (t=2.621, P=0.011) showed significant decrease, whereas Index of Well-Being (t=-2.522, P<0.013) increased significantly; the magnitude of these variations were significantly correlated with some personality traits had significant regression relationship with some demographic and job-specific variables. ConclusionThe CI program is effective, and the effect is affected by some personality, demographic and job-specific variables.

关 键 词：认知行为取向 危机干预 效果 影响因素 SCL-90 状态-特质焦虑问卷 幸福感指数量表 

分 类 号：B842.1[哲学宗教—基础心理学]