检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:许余龙[1]
出 处:《外国语》2002年第1期28-37,共10页Journal of Foreign Languages
摘 要:本文在简要介绍了Ariel的“语言学的、认知的”可及性理论和van Hoek以Langacker的认知语法为框架的回指规约理论的基础上,提出了一个以可及性和主题性为基本概念的“神经认知语言学”回指确认机制,旨在阐释人们是如何在一组可能的理解中选择所期望的理解的。可及性是由回指语表达的关于指称对象可及程度的信息,而主题性是由先行语表达的反映潜在先行语显著性的信息。作者认为,这两个名词性词语表达的篇章语义信息提供了回指确认的最重要、最基本的信息,是理解语篇回指现象的关键。After a brief review of Ariel抯 搇inguistic, cognitive?theory of Accessibility for the understanding of discourse anaphora and van Hoek抯 model of constraints on pronominal anaphora anchored in the framework of Langacker抯 Cognitive Grammar, this paper proposes a 搉eurocognitive linguistic?anaphora resolution mechanism based on the two concepts of Accessibility and Topicality, aiming at providing an explanation of how people choose the intended referent from among the possible ones. Accessibility is the information provided by the anaphor, indicating the relative ease or difficulty with which the referent can be accessed; whereas Topicality is the information provided by a nominal expression, indicating its relative prominence in competing for the antecedent-hood. These two types of discourse semantic meaning expressed by nominals constitute the essential information people use in discourse anaphora resolution.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33