Florida探针与普通牙周探针测量牙周袋深度的比较  

Comparisons of probing depth measurements with Florida probe and conventional periodontal probe

作　　者：康军[1] 曹采方[1] 沙月琴[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学口腔医学院牙周科,100081

出　　处：《现代口腔医学杂志》2005年第2期120-122,共3页Journal of Modern Stomatology

摘　　要：目的比较Florida探针与普通牙周探针测量牙周袋深度(probingdepth ,PD) 的重复性。方法对5例慢性牙周炎患者在牙周基础治疗前后,分别使用Florida探针与普通牙周探针重复测量PD值各两次。分别比较两种探针在治疗前/后测量PD值的重复性,并同一种探针在治疗前后测量PD值的重复性。结果在牙周基础治疗前后,两种探针测量的PD值重复性均良好(P >0 .0 5 ,相关系数范围为0 .77～0 .85 )。对治疗前患者两种探针重复性相近,而对治疗后患者Florida探针的重复性好于普通牙周探针(P <0 .0 5 )。结论Florida探针测量PD值的重复性良好,能可靠地应用于牙周临床研究。Objective To compare the reproducibility of probing depth (PD) measurements using the Florida probe and the conventional periodontal probe.Methods Before and after initial periodontal treatment, five patients with chronic periodontitis received repeated PD measurements using the Florida probe and the conventional periodontal probe, respectively. The reproducibility of PD measurements was compared between the two different probes. The reproducibility of PD measurements using the same probes was also compared before and after the treatment.Results The reproducibility of PD measurements with both of these probes was good (P>~0.05 , r=~0.77 ～~0.85 ) for both before and after initial treatment. Before the treatment, the reproducibility of these two probes was similar. After treatment, the reproducibility of the Florida probe was better than that of conventional periodontal probe (P<~0.05 ).Conclusion The reproducibility of PD measurements with the Florida probes is reliable, suggesting that it can be applied in clinical research.

关 键 词：PD 牙周袋 探针 患者 治疗前 牙周基础治疗 重复性 可靠 深度 

分 类 号：R781.4[医药卫生—口腔医学]