检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贺石林[1] 葛金文[2] 贺蓉[1] 梅志刚[2]
机构地区:[1]中南大学湘雅医学院止血生理实验室 [2]湖南中医学院血管生物实验室,湖南长沙410078
出 处:《中国药理学通报》2005年第3期277-279,共3页Chinese Pharmacological Bulletin
摘 要:质疑血清药理学的主要理由包括①从胃肠吸收的中药成分在体内是进入血浆,而不是血清;②凝血过程有一系列酶生成,同时刺激白细胞释放溶酶,这些酶可能降解某些中药成分;③凝血酶刺激血小板与白细胞释放大量生物活性物质;④凝血过程伴有纤溶、补体、激肽等系统活化;⑤制备与灭活血清过程会导致中药成分与中药介导体内释放物质损失。新近利用HPLCMS指纹图谱分析与抗白血病细胞增殖实验证明利用血清药理方法可能带来错误结论。建议加强中药多层次半体内实验研究,其中血浆药理方法可能避免血清药理方法的弊病。The main reasons to doubt the validity of serum pharmacology include:①The components of medical herbs absorbed from gastrointetinal tract enter circulating plasma,not serum in vivo.②Blood coagulation involves the activation of a series of proenzymes,and the proteases induce leukocytes to release lysosomal enzymes.These enzymes may degrade some herbal components.③Thrombin can stimulate platelets and leukocytes to secrete many biologically active substances.④Fibrinolysis,complement and kinin systems are activated during blood coagulation.⑤The processes of serum preparation and inactivation always cause lose of lots of herbal components. Recently finger printing analysis using HPLC-MS and antileukemic proliferation experiments showed that the results obtained from serum pharmacological method might be incorrect. We propose that the ex vivo experiments on multiple levels are necessary to elucidate the pharmacological actions and their mechanisms of medical herbs and believe that the pharmacological method using plasma absorbed herbal components should be better than that using serum.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28