检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:薛士敏[1] 沈勇环[1] 贺家李[1] 郭征[1]
机构地区:[1]天津大学电气与自动化工程学院,天津300072
出 处:《电力系统及其自动化学报》2005年第2期1-4,12,共5页Proceedings of the CSU-EPSA
摘 要:利用相位特性分析法和幅值特性分析法对复合式动作判据和自适应方向纵差保护动作判据进行了分析比较,两种动作判据都具有优良的制动特性。对这两种动作判据在两侧电流不同取值及内部故障和外部故障等不同情况下分别进行详细的分析,可知自适应方向纵差保护动作判据优于复合式动作判据。Compound pilot current differential operating criterion and adaptive directional pilot current differential operating criterion, a new operating criterion,are analysed and compared in this paper using phase characteristic analytical method and magnitude characteristic analytical method. Both operating criteria possess excellent restraining characteristic. Compound operating criterion and adaptive directional pilot current differential protective operating criterion are analysed respectively in detail when electric currents in two ends are different in case of all internal faults and external faults. The analysis given in the paper show that the adaptive directional pilot current differential protective operating criterion is better than the compound criterion.
分 类 号:TM77[电气工程—电力系统及自动化]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.82.248