从福克公司案看法院对我国涉外仲裁裁决的监督  

Court Supervising to Arbitral Award of Involved Foreign in China from the Case of Ferco

作　　者：赵秀文[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院

出　　处：《法学家》2005年第2期154-160,共7页The Jurist

摘　　要：本文结合中国法院和英国法院对中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会仲裁庭作出的福克公司仲裁案的裁决所实施的监督,阐述了在国际商事仲裁实践中,裁决地法院撤销其本国裁决和执行地法院拒绝承认与执行外国仲裁裁决的理由。作者认为,在国际商事仲裁立法与实践上,无论是仲裁地法院依法撤销或者执行在其境内作出的涉外仲裁裁决,还是执行地法院依法承认与执行外国仲裁裁决,均不对裁决所涉及的实体问题进行审查和监督。对仲裁裁决的司法复审与监督一般仅涉及程序方面的事项。This article studied grounds for which the Chinese court refused to set aside the arbitral award made by the arbitral tribunal of the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC) as to the case of Ferco, as well as that of the British court refusal to award the Ferco' s request for refusing recognition and enforcement of this CIETAC's award. It is the author's view that either the court of the state where the award was made or the court of the state where the recognition and enforcement was sought should not review the merits of the award in addition to review the procedure issues.

关 键 词：涉外仲裁裁决 中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会 监督 公司 外国仲裁裁决 国际商事仲裁 中国法院 仲裁立法 司法复审 执行 仲裁案 仲裁庭 仲裁地 实践 撤销 依法 阐述 理由 

分 类 号：D925.7[政治法律—诉讼法学] F752.3[政治法律—法学]