国际公约标准与我国刑事辩护制度之比较  

Comparison of the Standards of International Convention and Chinese Criminal Vindication System

作　　者：崔更国[1] 

机构地区：[1]石家庄铁路职业技术学院,河北石家庄050041

出　　处：《石家庄铁路职业技术学院学报》2005年第1期69-73,共5页Journal of Shijiazhuang Institute of Railway Technology

摘　　要：1998年我国签署了《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》,《关于律师作用的基本原则》对其又进行了细化。这两个国际文件都涉及到了刑事诉讼中对被追诉人辩护权的保护内容。以这两个国际文件的内容为标准,从辩护人的范围、辩护人介入刑事诉讼的时间、辩护的方式、刑事辩护人的权利和刑事辩护的保障五个方面与我国刑事辩护制度作了比较,评析我国刑事辩护制度的不足之处。Our country signed officially“The convention for citizen rights and political rights” in 1998. “The basic principles concerning attorneys’ function” further explains it in detail. The two international documents include the contents of protecting the defendants’ vindication rights in the course of criminal proceedings. The paper compares the international standards with our country’s criminal vindication system from five aspects (the scope of vindicator, time of vindicator getting involved in the criminal proceedings, way of vindicating, rights of criminal vindicator and protection of criminal vindication) and then comments and analyzes on the demerits of our country’s criminal vindication system.

关 键 词：刑事辩护制度 《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》 标准 刑事诉讼 1998年 刑事辩护人 律师作用 保护内容 被追诉人 不足之处 辩护权 文件 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学] TS107[政治法律—法学]