检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]淮北煤炭师范学院体育系,淮北235000 [2]曲阜师范大学公共体育部,曲阜273165
出 处:《首都体育学院学报》2005年第2期117-119,128,共4页Journal of Capital University of Physical Education and Sports
摘 要:以文献资料法和分析归纳法为主要研究方法,对体育测量信度估价研究的领域、估价方法、评价标准进行 了探讨。我国体育领域的专家、学者对体育测量信度已进行了比较全面的分析和研究,但调查量表的信度估价尚未 引起广大体育科研工作者的普遍关注与重视。教科书在体育测量信度估价方面应注重更新知识,结合体育测量的 需要汲取教育、心理、医药卫生等领域一些新理论、新的实用信度估价方法。不同的信度估价方法以不同的假定和 前提条件为基础,体育测量信度估价应针对具体条件科学地选择估价方法,建立不同的信度评价标准。Based on methods of literature reviews and analytical induction,the authors of the article have discussed the fields, evaluation methods and evaluation standard of the research of reliability evaluation in sports measurement. It is noted although many experts and scholars in sports field in China have carried all-round analysis and study toward the reliability in sports measurement, the reliability evaluation of questionnaires has not raised much attention and concern of most researchers in sports. Textbooks in the area of reliability evaluation in sports measurement should be adapted to include new knowledge, new theories and new practical methods in reliability evaluation from fields of education,psychology,health and medicine according to the needs of sports measurement. As different reliability evaluation methods are based on different presumptions and preconditions,the evaluation methods in reliability evaluation of sports measurement should be selected scientifically according to different situations with different evaluation standards setting up.
分 类 号:G80-32[文化科学—运动人体科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28