试论民事证据交换制度的困境与出路  

作　　者：陈志超[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学法学院,江苏南京210097

出　　处：《兰州学刊》2005年第2期186-188,共3页

摘　　要：我国已经规定了民事证据交换制度,但是在理论上存在合法性问题、价值取向问题,在实践中存在范围不科学、主体不明确、能否质证不明确、当事人调查取证难等问题,应从明确证据交换的类型、设立独立程序由法官主持交换、促进当事人积极举证、赋予当事人更大的收集证据的权力、防范滥用证据交换制度、制裁违法证据交换行为等方面入手,完善我国的证据交换制度。Our country had regulated the civil proof change system. But it has the problem with the lawful quality and the value orientation in the theory. And the limit is not definite , the ligitation is not definite ,the evidence can be confrontated or not is not definite , and it is very difficult to investigate the evidence for the ligitations.These are all the problems in practice .In order to improve the system ,we should definite the sort of the proof change ,set up the independence judge to manage the proof change ,accelerate the ligitation to discover proof ,give the ligitation more right to disuse the system ,punishment the illegal proof change.

关 键 词：证据交换 主体 制裁 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]