共同犯罪与身份问题的比较研究——以贪污犯为线索评析我国共同犯罪与身份问题立法  

A Comparative Study of the Issue of Status in Accomplice

作　　者：何承斌[1] 

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学法学院,湖南湘潭411105

出　　处：《安徽大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2005年第3期83-89,共7页Journal of Anhui University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：湘潭大学博士和博士后专项课题(04QDB5)

摘　　要：对有身份者与无身份者共同犯罪如何定罪量刑,是大陆法系国家刑法理论上有较大争议的问题,也是我国刑法理论界长期争执而未能解决的问题。与国外立法例相比较,我国大陆刑事立法对这一问题的关注,目前仅限于贪污罪,效力尚不及于其他身份犯,如受贿罪、挪用公款罪等,更不涉及此类共同犯罪的量刑问题。一些国家和地区在总则中专门规定这一问题的定罪与量刑的立法例值得我国大陆刑法典所借鉴。How to convict and sentence the accomplice with status and the accomplice without status has been a controversial issue in the countries of continental legal system. It’s been a similar case in Chinese criminal law as well. Compared with foreign legislative cases, Chinese criminal legislation at present has only paid attention in this aspect to the crime of corruption without involving other crimes of status, like that of bribery and embezzling,etc., let alone the conviction and sentencing of these crimes. The legislative cases in some countries concerning the conviction and sentencing of this problem sets a good example for Chinese law.

关 键 词：共同犯罪 身份 贪污罪 

分 类 号：D924.11[政治法律—刑法学]