检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西北工业大学,西安710072
出 处:《机械科学与技术》2005年第6期663-665,共3页Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering
基 金:航空科学基金项目(02C53019);汕头大学重点实验室开放基金项目资助
摘 要:对于一般的增量谐波平衡法而言,在求解分段线性系统周期响应时存在收敛速度慢的缺点。针对这一缺点,本文根据最小二乘法原理和增量过程提出了一种改进的增量谐波平衡算法,通过和原有算法进行对比发现二者之间存在着统一的算法形式,因此只要对原有算法作简单的改进即可方便地使用此方法。利用此方法成功计算了齿轮传动分段线性系统的周期解,通过对计算结果比较,发现迭代次数要比一般的增量谐波平衡法少30%左右。从而可以看出这种算法具有收敛速度快的优点。The general incremental harmonic balance(IHB) method has an inextricable shortcoming——the convergence rate is slow, or even the result is not convergent when it was used to deal with the periodic solution in piecewise linear vibration. In this paper, an improved incremental harmonic balance method was put forward to deal with this shortcoming. This improved method was based on least-square method and incremental disposal. The least-square method was used for obtaining the least values of harmonic coefficient and the incremental disposal was used to obtain the increment of every iterative step. Compared with the general incremental harmonic balance method, a united computing form is obtained. So long as a simple replacement was concerned, this improved method can be used directly in former formulas. When this method is used to deal with the periodic solution in piecewise linear system, the results by the improved method and the general method were compared, and we found that they were the same in phase plane. So this method is valid and the result is credible. It is noted that the iterative number of improved method was decreased by 30% as compared with the general incremental harmonic balance method. So this improved method has the advantage of quicker convergence.
分 类 号:TH132.33[机械工程—机械制造及自动化]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.104