检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田平[1]
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学哲学与社会学学院,北京100875
出 处:《自然辩证法通讯》2005年第3期40-45,110,共7页Journal of Dialectics of Nature
摘 要:2 0世纪6 0年代以来的一系列心理学实验,对关于理性能力的传统看法提出了挑战。80年代以后,研究者们在乔姆斯基关于能力与操作的区分的基础上,进一步反思理性能力本身。他们或者为传统的理性能力概念辩护,或者弱化传统的看法,或者用其他类型的规则来替换逻辑规则在理性能力中的位置。这些理论各有其独特的启发意义,也面临各自的问题。在进一步的理性能力研究中。The traditional conception of rationality was challenged by a series of psychological experiments conducted during and after 1960s. Since 1980s, researchers have made further reflections on rationality on the basis of Chomsky's distinction between competence and performance. Some of them defended the traditional view, some of them weakened the view, and some of them replaced logical rules with different sets of rules. The theories are both inspiring and problematic. We need to pay more attention to different dimensions of rationality and the historical and present environment in which rationality works.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117