检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京医科大学第一医院妇产科
出 处:《中华妇产科杂志》1994年第4期235-237,共3页Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
摘 要:对我院1962年至1989年收治的67例I期卵巢上皮性癌患者进行回顾性分析。按收治年代将其分为三组。结果:三组除采用的化学疗法(化疗)的方法不同外,其它治疗及患者的临床病理特点比较,差异无显著意义。60年代(第一组)、70年代(第二组)、80年代(第三组)治疗的愚者预后随时间逐步改善,其5年生存率分别为46%、82%和97%。第一组与第二组5年生存率比较,差异有非常显著意义(P<0.001);第二组与第三组比较,差异有显著意义(P<0.05)。多因素分析显示,化疗及临床分期是影响预后的重要因素(P均<0.01),其次是病理分级(P<0.05)。多疗程联合化疗、Ia期患者及肿瘤分化I、II级患者预后好。本研究还就I期卵巢上皮性癌的化疗、手术准确分期及保留生育功能进行了讨论。From 1962 to 1989,67 patients with stage Iepithelial ovarian cancer were treated in our hospital.They were divided into three groups according to thetime period of treatment.Thirteen patients treated inthe 1960s were in group 1,23 in the 1970s in group2,and 31 in 1980s in group 3.There were no other signi-ficant differenees other than the adjuvantchemotherapy in the three groups.In this study, the5-year survlval rate was 46% in group 1(1962~190),82% in group 2(1970~1979),and 97% ingroup 3( 1980~1989).The prognosis was improvedsignificantly from 1960s to 1970s (P< 0.005),as well asfrom 1970s to 1980s(P<0.05).Multivariate analysisindicated adjuvant chemotherapy(P<0.01),stage(P<0.01),and histological grade(P<0.05)as havingindependent prognosticeffects.Patients with morethan 4 courses of combination chemotherapy,stage la,grade I and grade II had a better survival rate.Thechemotherapy,complete surgical staging and preserva-tion of fertility in surgical treatment of stage Iepithelial ovarian cancer were aslo discussed.
分 类 号:R737.310.7[医药卫生—肿瘤]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15