国家赔偿责任归责原则之回归  

Replacement of Imputation of State Indemnity Law

作　　者：刘臻荣[1] 何亚宏[2] 

机构地区：[1]山西大学法学院,山西太原030006 [2]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872

出　　处：《山西大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2005年第3期78-81,共4页Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：归责原则作为侵权行为类型化的根据,具有统领侵权行为法其他规范的作用。国家公权力侵权行为,虽为一种特殊的侵权行为,但仍属侵权行为法总的归责原则之统辖范围。因此,“违法责任归责原则”的提法在理论上是不成立的,有必要回归到“无过错责任原则”的正确表述上来。这种回归不仅仅是法律术语规范的需要,更为重要的是,它可以引导我们把国家赔偿法的研究重心放在公权行为的违法特性方面。As the criterion for differentiating the categories of torts, imputation principles dominate other legal norms. Though the tort act of state power is the tort of obvious characteristics, general imputation principles of the tort law can still be applied to. Therefore, the expression of illegal liability is not accurate and must be replaced by principle of no-fault liability. Not only is it the normal usage of legal terms, but also the replacement can make us focus on the research of the illegality of power.

关 键 词：违法责任原则 无过错责任原则 回归 

分 类 号：D922.11[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]