检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖北师范学院教育系,黄石435002 [2]湖北省大冶市第一中学
出 处:《中国学校卫生》2005年第5期370-371,共2页Chinese Journal of School Health
基 金:全国教育科学"十五"规划重点课题项目(项目批准号:BBA010049)
摘 要:目的分析高一学生学习主体性发展的现状和特点,为后续教育干预实验提供实证依据。方法采用《中学生学习主体性问卷》调查高一学生219名学习主体性的发展水平,运用t检验比较学习主体性发展的性别和班级类型差异结果高一学生的责任感和主动性的平均分较高,自信心和坚持性的平均得分较低。高一男女生的学习主体性整体水平差异无显著性,但男生的独立性高于女生;示范班学生学习主体性整体水平非常显著地高于普通班学生,其坚持性、自觉性、责任感和主动性均显著高于普通班。结论高一学生学习主体性发展的性别差异不显著,而班级类型差异极为明显。Objective To analyze the characteristics of students' learning initiative of grade 1 students in a high school, and to provide substantial evidence for the following educational intervention experiment. Methods A questionnaire about middle school students' learning initiative was adopted to access 219 high school students, sex and class differences were examined with t-test. Results The students got higher scores on responsibility and active-ness, while lower on self-confidence and perseverance. Boys' learning initiative showed no significant difference from girls' , but boys' independence was higher than girls. Students from key class got higher scores on total learning initiative, perseverance, consciousness, responsibility and activeness than those from general class. Conclusion Differences of learning initiative exist among students from different classes, but no significant differences are found in genders.
分 类 号:R395.6[哲学宗教—心理学] G442[医药卫生—医学心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.159.67