检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘丽梅[1]
出 处:《吉林公安高等专科学校学报》2005年第3期58-61,共4页Journal of Jilin Public Secunity Academy
摘 要:超期羁押是我国刑事司法实践中的一大顽症。多年来,我国虽然采取了各种治理超期羁押的措施,但往往是“前清后超,边清边超”,此消彼长。超期羁押的存在严重地侵犯了被羁押人的合法权益,妨碍了刑事诉讼活动的公平和效率,破坏了正常的司法诉讼程序,浪费了有限的司法资源。通过对我国目前超期羁押的现状和其深层次原因的分析,结合国际准则,可以对我国超期羁押问题进行改革探讨,提出更贴近我国司法实践的解决问题的对策。Overtime detain is a persistent problem of our country’s penal judicial practice. For years, although our country has adopted all kinds of measures to manage overtime detain, it usually resulted in “ overtime after solving, overtime while solving”, up here down there. The existence of overtime detain seriously intrudes the legal right of the detainees and obstructs the fairness and efficiency of the penal lawsuit, destroys the normal judicial lawsuit procession and wastes limited judicial resources. By analysis of the present state of our country’s overtime detain, combined with the international regulations, the problem of overtime detain can be reformed and discussed and put forward the countermeasure closer to our country’s judicial practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145