检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中山大学法学院04级刑法专业研究生 [2]中山大学
出 处:《中山大学研究生学刊(社会科学版)》2005年第2期84-91,共8页Journal of the Graduates Sun YAT-SEN University(Social Sciences)
摘 要:关于共同正犯个别中止问题,存在着客观说(既遂说)、主观说(中止说)以及折衷说(未遂说)之争。长期以来,学者对于主观说的论证均局限于行为人主观恶性减少、刑法的期待可能性以及中止犯立法意图等范畴之内,回避了单独犯罪与共同犯罪的中止认定标准的理论同一性问题,使该点成为备受折衷说攻击的理论弱点。本文从既遂、中止和未遂的分界入手,试图通过对中止犯有效性进行重新解释,解决单独犯罪与共同犯罪中止认定标准的理论同一性问题。In a long time, there are different ideas about how to found to the discontinuance of joint principal offender's crime. In the author'opinion, if someone eliminate their influence on the other joint principal offenders and break away from them, they should not be responsible for the subsequent result of other joint principal offenders and their action belong to discontinuance of joint principal offender's crime. In order to understand the discontinuance of joint principal offender's crime better and try to improve legislation and justice concerning crime discontinuance; the anthor try. to make a deep research on the discontinuance of joint principal offender's crime in this article.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229