检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]解放军理工大学指挥自动化学院,江苏南京210007 [2]总参第61研究所,北京100039
出 处:《解放军理工大学学报(自然科学版)》2005年第3期241-245,共5页Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology(Natural Science Edition)
摘 要:战术IP网络要求路由协议具有较快的收敛性、较小的端到端时延和遭遇突发事件时较强的数据响应能力。利用OPNET仿真工具,比较了OSPF和EIGRP这两种协议上述3个方面性能的差别。仿真结果表明:EIGRP的收敛性比OSPF快近2倍并且峰值流量减少了50%,平均端到端时延比OSPF减少了20%,异常情况下对数据的响应时间明显少于OSPF。因此,EIGRP协议更适用于战术IP网络。同时,针对OSPF协议提出了一些修改建议。Tactical IP networks have special requirem e nts for a routing protocol. The most important ones are fast convergence, short end-to-end delay and the ability to recover from emergencies quickly. With OPN ET, this paper compared the performances of EIGRP and OSPF in the above aspects with the result that the convergence of EIGRP is about 2 times faster than OSPF and pea k traffic in the former is about 50% of the latter. The end-to-end delay with EIGRP is about 20% less than with OSPF. The response time is less either in EIGR P. In summery, EIGRP is more suitable for tactical IP networks than OSPF. Some suggestions were put forward to improve the performance of OSPF.
关 键 词:开放最短路径优先 增强型内部网关路由协议 收敛性 时延 响应时间
分 类 号:TP393[自动化与计算机技术—计算机应用技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28