检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:荣晓红[1]
机构地区:[1]最高人民检察院法律政策研究室,北京100081
出 处:《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2005年第4期33-38,共6页Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
摘 要:我国学术界对我国民事再审程序提起主体和再审程序中举证时限问题的论争很多。当事人申请再审诉权、申诉权的特性及其与检察院、法院审判监督权的对立统一关系说明,有必要保留检察院、法院提起民事再审程序的权力。我国民事再审程序中当事人举证时限制度也需要进一步完善。至此,我国民事再审程序需要重构。There are many opinions about the main bodies of submitting the civil retrial procedure and the time limit of giving evi-dences in the academic circles of our country, the features of the clients' right of applying for the civil retrial procedure and appeal, to-gether with the relationship of the unity of opposites between the power of supervising trial by the procuratorates and the courts and theclients' right of applying for the civil retrial procedure and appeal, implying that the power of submitting the civil retrial procedure bythe procuratorates and the courts should be kept necessarily, meanwhile, the system of the time limit of giving evidences by the clientsneeds further amending as well.On account of these, the legislative proposals of reconstructing our country's civil retrial procedureshould be put forward.
关 键 词:民事再审程序 重构 对立统一关系 举证时限制度 审判监督权 时限问题 提起主体 再审诉权 当事人 检察院 学术界 申诉权 法院 权力
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229