论《礼记》与《孔子家语》的关系  

The Relation of The Book of Rites and the Sayings Of Confucius

作　　者：陈剑[1] 黄海烈[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学古籍所,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《古籍整理研究学刊》2005年第4期59-64,共6页Journal of Ancient Books Collation and Studies

摘　　要：《孔子家语》长期以来一直被认为是伪书。1973年河北定县西汉中山王墓出土了《儒家者言》一篇,内容与《家语》相关,1977年安徽阜阳双古堆汉墓也出土了与《家语》有关的简牍。在某种程度上证明了《家语》不伪。本文校勘了《家语》与《礼记》中相同的篇章,检视了《家语》与《礼记》的三种可能性,《礼记》与《家语》在文本上存在极大差异,绝不是王肃伪作了《家语》,也绝不会是《礼记》抄袭了《家语》,二者都是流传有本的。儒家文献都来自于原始的弟子笔记,对这些原始材料的编撰,形成单篇的儒家文献,这些单篇的文献分合不定,不同的人据以编订不同的集子,从而形成《礼记》《大戴礼记》。《家语》编撰者所据以编订《家语》的材料同《礼记》相同,而不是抄袭《礼记》。二者出现相同的部分也正是缘于此。《家语》是众多伪书中久成铁案的一部,对它的正名应当警醒我们对伪书的理解,反思什么是“伪”,怎样定义“伪”。The Book of Rites and Sayings of Confucius is two important Confucianists documents. There are same content in the some chapter of two books. Some people think The Book of Rites plagiarizes the Sayings of Confucius. Some people think the Sayings of Confucius plagiarizes The Book of Rites. Some person think there is no closely relation. After the collating same chapters we inspect three possibilities one by one and affirm the Sayings of Confucius is not Wang Su's work and shows clearly the course of two books's forming.

关 键 词：礼记 孔子家语 

分 类 号：G256[文化科学—图书馆学]