检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梅其在[1] 张念察[1] 孙家邦[1] 王湘衡[1] 贾建国[1]
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学宣武医院放射科,首都医科大学宣武医院外科
出 处:《中华放射学杂志》1995年第11期777-780,共4页Chinese Journal of Radiology
摘 要:作者应用CT分组和Ranson分类早期预测急性胰腺炎(AP)严重度。搜集住院病例86例,重症38例,轻度48例。将AP的CT表现分为二组:有胰周蜂窝组织炎为重症AP(Il组),余为轻度AP(I组);将Ranson标准分三类:Ranson数≥3分为重症AP(2,3类),余为轻度AP(1类)。结果表明:CT分组和Ranson分类预测重症AP的敏感性、特异性和准确指数分别为92.1%,90%,82.1%和97.3%,52%,49.3%,二种预测方法的特异性和准确指数有非常显著的组间差异(P<0.005)。CT分组结合Ranson分类预测重症AP的准确指数为83.2%,不比CT更优越多少(P>0.05)。研究认为胰周蜂窝组织炎作为重症AP的早期CT诊断标准,其准确性明显优于Ranson分类。The purpose of this paper was to find a more reliable rnethod of predicting severe cut pancreatitis(AP)by means of CT grouping(CT-G)and Ranson classification(Ranson-C).In this series of 86 cases,there were severe AP (38 cases)and mild AP (48 cases).According to CT findings,these were divided into two groups:group l without phlegmon and group 2 with phlegmon:According to Ranson scores,they were again divided into three classes (R1,R2, R3).Those with scores≤3 were classified into mild AP(Rl),the rest into severe AP (R2,R3).The resuIts shOwed that sensitivity, specificity and Youden′index of early prediction of severe AP were 92.1%, 90%,82.1%for CT-Gand 97.3%,52%,49.3%for RansonCrespectively. There was significant differ- ence between CTG and RansonC in regard to specificity and Youden′s index(P<0.005).The com- bined Youden′ s index of CT-Gwith Ranson-Cwas 83.2%,The authors concluded that peripancreat- ic phlegmon is a CT diagnostic criterion of severe AP in the early stage and the accuracy of CT-Gis much better than Ranson-C.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.94