检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐开寿[1] 麦坚凝[1] 何璐[1] 梁惠慈[1] 梁小娴[1] 罗源利[2]
机构地区:[1]广州市儿童医院神经康复科,广东广州510120 [2]广州市儿童医院放射科,广东广州510120
出 处:《中国康复》2005年第4期222-223,共2页Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation
基 金:广东省科技厅基金资助(20021186)
摘 要:目的:研究脑瘫患儿配备坐姿矫正系统对卧位与坐位功能的影响。方法:坐姿功能异常的脑瘫患儿34例,随机分为矫正组和对照组各17例,均采用Bobath、Vojta和Rood等神经生理学疗法,矫正组同时配备坐姿矫正系统。治疗前后采用粗大运动功能评价量表(GMFM)对卧位、翻身、坐位等项进行功能评定。结果:治疗3个月后,2组GMFM得分均较治疗前明显提高(均P<0.001),矫正组得分高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:配备坐姿矫正系统辅以神经生理学疗法更利于提高脑瘫患儿卧位与坐位功能。Objective: To study the effects of seating position system on lying and sitting ability of children with cerebral palsy. Methods: Thirty-four cases of cerebral palsy children with abnormal sitting posture were divided into 2 groups. The redress group was treated with seating position system and neurodevelopment therapy. The control group was only treated with neurodevelopment therapy. Gross motor function measure (GMFM) was performed before and after treatment. Result: After treatment, the GMFM results in the two groups were significantly improved as compared with those before treatment (P〈0. 001). The score of the redress group was more remarkably than that of the control group (P^0.05). Conclusion: The results of seating position system combined with neurodevelopment therapy were better than neurodevelopment therapy alone for cerebral palsy children.
分 类 号:R742.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28