我国刑事诉讼强制措施权性质之辨析——分权视野的审视  

Analysis of the Essence of Compulsory Measures in Our Country's Criminal Procedure Law——from the Angle of Separation of State Powers

作　　者：徐阳[1] 

机构地区：[1]辽宁大学法学院,辽宁沈阳110136

出　　处：《大连理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第2期88-91,共4页Journal of Dalian University of Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：辽宁省教育厅资助项目(20060352)

摘　　要：我国"总则性"的强制措施在由不同国家机关运用时体现出不同的特质。拘传在审前与审判程序中的适用就存在明显差异性。刑事诉讼法对享有拘留权的主体也进行了区分,这也在一定程度上说明不同主体适用的强制措施在属性上存在差异。立足于分权视野,不同国家机关适用的强制措施具有不同的权力属性。司法令状主义是国外强制措施权配置的基本原则,在我国的特定制度条件下,应以检察监督为强制措施权配置的核心。Compulsive measures as the general provisions in Chinese criminal procedure law show their respective characters,when they are carried out by respective state establishments.There are differences between the application of warrant to appearance of the criminal suspect or defendant in pretrial and trial procedure.In the criminal procedure law,only certain subjects are granted to detain the suspect,which in some degree shows the differences of essence of compulsory measures.From the angle of separation of sta...

关 键 词：强制措施 分权 司法令状 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]