检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马磊[1] 王家同 黄远桂[1] 苏衡 候艳红 肖利军 闫其乐 王伟 刘晓军
机构地区:[1]第四军医大学西京医院神经内科 [2]航空航天医学系心理学教研室,陕西西安710032
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2005年第3期277-278,281,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:全军医药卫生科研基金资助(项目号:01L072)
摘 要:目的:在经历创伤事件的人群中检验MMPI-2中适应不良量表的效度。方法:研究对象为43名入院治疗的应激障碍(SD)患者和44名适应良好的创伤幸存者(TS)。以8个临床量表的T分数均值(M8)为适应不良效标,与MMPI-2中的7个适应不良量表进行比较。结果:SD患者有6个量表显著高于TS;两组研究对象的大多数量表均与M8显著相关;尽管F和PK增加了对SD患者或TS适应不良方差变异的解释,Pt在两组被试中均显著增加了其他变量对适应不良的预测作用。结论:MMPI-2中多数适应不良量表的效度较满意,Pt对创伤后适应不良具有普遍较好的预测作用。Objective: To investigate validities of MMPI-2 measures of general maladjustment in people who had experienced traumatic events. Methods: Participants were 43 patients with stress disorder (SD) and 44 well-adjusted trauma survivors(TS). Validities of 7 MMPI-2 measures of general maladjustment were compared with the mean scores on 8 clinical scales (MS), which were considered as the criterion measure of general maladjustment. Results: Patients with SD obtained significantly higher scores on 6 measures and M8 than TS. Most of the measures were significantly related to M8 in both groups. Although F and PK sometimes added significantly to the variance accounting for the criterion measure, Pt added significantly and meaningfully to each of the other MMPI-2 measure in predicting maladjustment. Conclusion: The results support the use of the MMPI-2 as a measure of general maladjustment in trauma survivors. Pt emerges consistently as a good indicator of general maladjustment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229