不同材料桩核冠修复的临床对比研究  

Comparison study on the restoration of different post-core-crown materials

作　　者：牟月照[1] 张莲霞 吴峻岭[3] 

机构地区：[1]山东省立医院口腔科,主任医师教授山东250021 [2]山东省立医院器械科,主管技师山东250021 [3]四川大学华西口腔医学院,博士生四川610041

出　　处：《口腔颌面修复学杂志》2005年第3期186-189,192,共5页Chinese Journal of Prosthodontics

基　　金：山东省自然科学基金项目(Y2002C03)

摘　　要：目的:评价不同材料桩—核—冠系列修复的远期保存率及美观效果。方法:对采用新型桩核材料Core-Paste(以下简称CP)、新型全瓷材料(CerinatePorcelain,CE)或釉质瓷(BelleglassHP,BGHP)完成的桩—核—冠系列修复与传统的金属铸造桩-核-冠的修复效果进行对比分析及跟踪观察。结果:不同材料的桩核修复后,远期保存率无显著性差异(P<0.05);美观效果由于冠的材料不同而受到影响。结论:复合桩是一种较理想的桩核设计。CP复合材桩—核—全瓷冠系列修复法,既有较高的远期保存率,又有良好的美观效果,是一种较理想的桩冠修复方法。Objective： To evaluate the long-term effectiveness and aesthetic satisfaction of post-core-crown restoration systems of different material. Methods： Three different materials （Core-Paste, Cerinate porcelain, BGHP enamal porcelain） were used in post-core-crown restorations. Their effects were analyzed and contrasted with traditional cast metal post-and-core restoration and subscquent researches were conducted as well. Results： No significant difference was found in long-term effectiveness of post-core restoration with different materials （P〈0.05）. Aesthetical results varied from different crown materials. Conclusion： Compound post is the most ideal post. Restoration method using CP compound post-and-core plus full ceramic crown has the most outstanding performance in clinical restoration for its permanence and aesthetical satisfaction.

关 键 词：桩核技术 全冠 烤瓷熔附金属全冠 牙瓷料 桩核材料 全瓷材料 修复 

分 类 号：R783[医药卫生—口腔医学]