检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国.广东省汕头市第四人民医院,515021
出 处:《国际中华神经精神医学杂志》2005年第3期233-235,共3页
摘 要:目的探讨焦虑障碍和抑郁障碍人格基础是否相同。方法使用CPI-RC、HAMD和HAMA对符合DSM-Ⅵ焦虑障碍、抑郁障碍30例进行评定,并与30名正常人进行对照。结果1.焦虑组Do、Cs、Sy、Sp、Sa、In、Em高于抑郁组(P〈0.01),抑郁组Sc、Gi、To高于焦虑组(P〈0.01);焦虑组除Em高于对照组(P〈0.01)外,In、Re、So、Sc、Gi、Cm、To、Ac、Ai、Ie、Py低于封照组(P〈0.05、P〈0.01);抑郁组Sc、To、Fx与对照组无差别,其余各量表分均低于对照组。2.各组的人格类型构成分布有非常显着的差异(P〈0.01)。3.焦虑组和抑郁组的自我实现水平低于对照组(P〈0.01)。结论焦虑障碍和抑郁障碍的自我确认和人际适应水平以及人格类型不同。Objective To explore the relationship of personality characteristics in anxiety disorder and depression disorder. Methods 30 patients who only met major depression in DSM- Ⅵ (depression group), 30 patients who only met generalized anxiety disorder or panic disorder in DSM- Ⅵ (anxiety group) were investigated. All patients were assessed by CPI-RC, HAMA, HAMD. While some indexes were compared with normal controls. Results 1. A few of patients whose scores of the 20 subscales in CPI was higher than the normal controls. Anxiety disorder had higher scores in Em (P〈0.01). Anxiety disorder had higher scores in Do/Cs/Sy/Sp/Sa/In/Em than depression disorder (P〈0.01). 2. There were great striking differences at constitution and distribution of personality's type (P〈0.01). 3. There were also great striking differences at constitution and of the self-achieve level (P〈0.01). Conclusion Anxiety disorder and depression disorder have obviously different in personality characteristics and personality type.
关 键 词:焦虑障碍 抑郁障碍 人格特征 人格类型 对照研究 CPI-RC 适应水平 对照组 HAMA HAMD
分 类 号:R749.4[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学] R749.72[医药卫生—临床医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.127