检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:殷允娟[1] 曾蒙苏[1] 李卉[1] 陈财忠[1] 沈继章[1] 施伟斌[1]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学附属中山医院放射科
出 处:《临床放射学杂志》2005年第9期792-795,共4页Journal of Clinical Radiology
摘 要:目的对胰腺癌胰周血管侵犯判断的最佳序列进行评价,并探讨MRI判断胰腺癌胰周血管侵犯的敏感性、特异性及准确性.资料与方法搜集22例经手术病理证实的胰腺癌病例,所有患者均行平扫的SE T 1WI、FSE T 2WI、SE T 1WI+FS序列扫描,同时行动态增强GRE(DCE FMPSPGR)序列的三期扫描.对该22例患者术前胰周血管侵犯情况进行回顾性分析: (1)按照肿瘤对周围血管侵犯的程度,采用0~3级的等级法进行术前盲法评分,统计血管侵犯及无侵犯的支数,并同手术结果对照.分析0~3各级别对于血管侵犯与否判断其敏感性. (2)统计SE T 1WI及DCE FMPSPGR两序列分别及结合起来评价胰周血管侵犯敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确性.结果 22例患者7段共154支血管中,术中发现51支有侵犯,103支无侵犯.其中SE T 1WI术前诊断45支受侵,109支无侵犯,漏诊6支,误诊3支.DCE FMPSPGR诊断43支受侵,111支正常,漏诊8支,误诊2支.SE T 1WI和DCE FMPSPGR分别及两者相结合判断血管受侵的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确性分别为:88.2%、97%、93.8%、94.3%、94.2%;84.3%、98.0%、95.5%、92.7%、93.5%;92.1%、98.0%、95.9%、96.2%、96.1%.结论 MRI判断胰周血管侵犯的敏感性为92.1%,特异性为98.0%,诊断准确性96.1%.以SE T 1WI和DCE FMPSPGR两序列较优,两者结合起来可以提高判断的准确性.Objective To discuss the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRI in evaluating the invasion of pancreatic carcinoma to surrounding vessels, and further evaluate the optimal scanning sequences. Materials and Methods 22 cases of pancreatic carcinomas verified with surgical pathology were collected, MRI sequences such as SE T1WI, FSE T2WI, FSE T1W + FS and dynamic contrast enhanced GRE triphase scans were performed. The invasion of peripancreatic vessels were retrospectively analyzed : ( 1 ) According to the degree of invasion, grading method as 0 - 3 grades was employed for blinded scoring, the numbers of vessels invasion and non-invasion were calculated, and compared with the surgical-pathology results, the accuracy of each grade for vessels invasion were analyzed. (2) The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy for SE T1WI and DCE FMPSPGR were also calculated respectively. Results Totally, 154 vessels of 22 cases were involved. 51 vessels were invasive and 103 vessels were non-invasive. 45 vessels were invasive, 109 vessels were non-invasive and 6 vessels were misdiagnosed by SE T1W, 43 vessels were invasive, 111 vessels were non-invasive and 2 vessels were misdiagnosed by DCE FMPSPGR, The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of SE T1WI and DCE FMPSPGR and SE T1WI + DCE FMPSPGR for vessels invasion were: 88.2% , 97.0% . 93.8% , 94.3% , 94.2% ; 84.3% , 98.0%, 95.5%, 92.7%, 93.5%; 92.1%, 98.0%, 95.9%, 96.2%, 96.1% respectively, Conclusion The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRI for peripancreatic vessels invasion were 92.1% , 98.0% and 96.1% respectively, SE T1W and DCE FMPSPGR sequence are better for detection of peripancreatic vessels invasion, combined with SE T1W and DCE FMPSPGR sequence could improve the accuracy of diagnosis,
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229