检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]吉林大学法学院,吉林长春130012 [2]中国刑警学院法律系,辽宁沈阳110035
出 处:《吉林大学社会科学学报》2005年第5期122-127,共6页Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(04CFX017)
摘 要:现行刑事诉讼法将羁押作为拘留与逮捕后续的当然状态,必然导致羁押的滥用。根据无罪推定原则的要求,未决羁押应属非常态的例外,故应通过完善羁押的实质条件予以理性控制,尽量减少羁押。建议将羁押从拘留、逮捕中剥离出来,并以现行的逮捕条件为基础,严格羁押的实质条件:适当提高羁押的证明标准,完善“罪疑条件”;对“罪重条件”加以必要的法定限制;明晰“必要性条件”,这是减少羁押的关键。Criminal Procedure Law in operation regards Custody' s as a natural state after detention and arrest must cause the abuse of custody. According to the requirement of the doctrine of the presumption of innocence, pending custody should regard as an exception of abnormal state. So, it can be controlled by reason through completing the Custody' s essence condition in order to reduce the custody use. This article proposes stripping out custody from detention and arrest, based on the arrest condition in operation to determine strictly the Custody' s essence condition. It also suggests to improve the Custody' s standard of proof properly, complete the condition of “doubtful crime”, and make legal restriction essential to the condition of “serious crime”. And it is the key to reduce custody that is to define clearly the “essential condition”.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.224.70.193