论单位、团体内部纠纷的自律性处理与民事审判权的界限  

On the Boundary between Self-disciplining Disposition to Inner Disputesof Enterprises or Communities and Civil Jurisdiction

作　　者：廖永安[1] 

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学法学院,湖南湘潭411105

出　　处：《湘潭大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2005年第5期74-78,共5页Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金项目:民事审判权作用范围研究(05CFX023)。

摘　　要：法院审判权能否作用于单位、团体内部纠纷是近年诉讼法学理论界一个比较困惑的问题。从现代西方国家发展趋势来看,随着民主法治观念日益深入人心,法院审判权正逐步扩大对单位、团体内部纠纷与争议的处理。具体就我们国家而言,民事审判权也有进一步扩大对单位、团体内部纠纷与争议处理的必要,但同时应遵循以下原则:第一、技术事项例外原则;第二、用尽团体组织内部救济原则;第三、合法有效的仲裁条款排除司法管辖原则。It is a puzzle in the academic domain of procedure law in recent years whether jurisdiction of court can act on the internal disputes of enterprises and communities or not. With the development of law in the modern western countries, the idea of democracy and law increasingly permeates into every aspect of people＇s life. Jurisdiction of court is further enlarged to handle the internal disputes and dissensions of enterprises and communities. Take China for example, it is necessary to widen civil jurisdiction to handle the interhal disputes and dissensions of enterprises and communities whereas the following principles should be observed ： First, technological item is exceptional ; second, the principle of exerting internal relief in the group ; third, legal and effective arbitral clauses exclude judicial domination.

关 键 词：内部纠纷 自律性 民事审判权 特别权力关系 

分 类 号：DF72[政治法律—诉讼法学]