对视听资料法律地位的再思考  

Restudying the Legal Status of Audio-visual Materials

作　　者：张斌[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872

出　　处：《四川大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2005年第6期134-142,共9页Journal of Sichuan University：Philosophy and Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"科学证据采信基本原理研究"的阶段性成果之一(05CFX018)

摘　　要：对视听资料的法律地位一直存在“独立论”与“非独立论”之争。要解决这个问题,首先要明确视听资料应当包括什么范围。范围的确定应从视听资料的语词分析和立法考察中得出,它包括音像证据和计算机证据。“独立论”与“非独立论”之争可转换为视听资料应否归入书证的问题。音像证据和计算机证据归入书证具有部分合理性,但在我国语境下不适用。明确视听资料的法律地位,有利于建立运用视听资料的证据规则、证据调查程序和方法。There has always been a dispute between two opinions of regarding audio-visual evidence as “an independent category of evidence”and as “a non-independent category of evidence”. To solve this dispute, we must firstly have a clear recognition of the scope of audio-visual materials. From the angles of semantic analysis and legislative study, audio-visual materials include sound-recording evidence, video evidence and computer evidence. The dispute between “independent category” and “non-independent category”can be thought to be a question of whether audio-visual materials can be classified into documentary evidence. It is to some extent reasonable to classify sound-recording evidence, video evidence and computer evidence into documentary evidence, but this is not practical in the context of our country. To clarify the legal status of audio-visual materials is helpful for the establishment of the evidentiary rules governing the use of audio-visual materials and the procedure and approaches of evidentiary investigation.

关 键 词：视听资料的法律地位 音像证据 计算机证据 

分 类 号：DF713[政治法律—诉讼法学]