检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广元市第二人民医院,四川广元628017 [2]中国烧伤创疡科技中心,北京100020
出 处:《中国烧伤创疡杂志》2005年第4期285-287,共3页The Chinese Journal of Burns Wounds & Surface Ulcers
摘 要:目的:寻找面部皮肤软组织擦挫伤的最佳治疗方法。方法:随机将面部皮肤软组织擦挫伤在Ⅱ~Ⅲ度之间的160例病人分为两组:90例创面采用烧伤湿润医疗技术(MEBT/MEBO)方法换药治疗(治疗组);70例创面采用传统外科方法换药治疗(对照组)。观察两组治疗方法在换药过程中病人的痛苦程度、感染发生率、创面愈合时间、瘢痕发生率以及皮肤色素沉着等。结果:治疗组在创面愈合时间、瘢痕生长,皮肤色素沉着及感染发生率等方面都明显少于对照组。结论:在治疗面部皮肤软组织擦挫伤中,MEBT/MEBO法明显优于传统外科治疗方法,是目前治疗面部皮肤软组织擦挫伤的良好方法之一,值得推广应用。Objective: To find a good method for treating face skin soft tissue contusion. Method: 160 cases of this disease with 2^nd and 3^nd degree wounds were divided into 2 groups. In treatment group, 90 cases were treated with MEBT/MEBO, and in control group, 70 cases were treated with conventional surgical treatment. The efficacy of the 2 groups was compared including the severity of pain, the incidence of wound infection, wound healing time, scar formation rate and skin pigmentation. Result: The efficacy of MEBT/MEBO was superior to conventional surgical treatment in terms of wound healing time, scar formation and wound infection rate and skin pigmentation. Conclusion: MEBO; treatment; face skin; contusion
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28