塔斯基把“己过”归罪于“语言”——评两个悖论之冠:“说谎者”、“亦此亦彼”  

Tarski Attrubuting "His Own Mistake" to "Language" ——"Liar Variant" Paradox Commits "Contradictory Definition" Fallacy

作　　者：黄展骥 

机构地区：[1]中国香港

出　　处：《合肥学院学报（社会科学版）》2005年第4期56-60,共5页Journal of Hefei University:Social Sciences

摘　　要：塔斯基宣判“自然(日常)语言”死刑,是因为他发现它内含“矛盾被证”。塔斯基误把自己犯的“矛盾定义”谬误“迁怒”、“归罪”于语言本身,所以塔斯基的“层级论”应被抛弃;哥德尔和塔斯基两者的理论“相通”,自然也会受到质疑。Tat-ski condemns ＂natural language＂ into death, because he thinks that it consists of ＂contradiction proved＂. This essay points out： Tarski commits and attributes his own ＂contradictory definition＂ fallacy to ＂language＂ itself; therefore his ＂theory of types＂ should be discarded. Bcause of the inherent relation between Godel＇s theory and Tat＇ski＇s, we may also show doubt about the former theory.

关 键 词：塔斯基 哥德尔 谬误 自然语言 矛盾被证 矛盾定义 

分 类 号：B812.5[哲学宗教—逻辑学]