检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]第四军医大学口腔医学院 [2]第二人民医院口腔科,陕西西安710032
出 处:《牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志》2005年第11期621-623,共3页Chinese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
摘 要:目的:评价分析ProPex根管测量仪测量磨牙牙齿操作长度的准确性。方法:选择116例根管治疗术的患者共130个磨牙383个根管,分为3组。A组:因根管欠充须再治疗者30个牙91个根管;B组:因修复治疗需要去髓术者46个牙130个根管;C组:慢性根尖周炎54个牙162个根管。以Propex测量牙齿操作长度。按此长度预备并充填根管,即刻拍摄X线片,观察并测量根管充填情况。结果:ProPex测量磨牙牙齿操作长度的准确率:A组86.8%,B组96.2%,C组85.8%。结论:ProPex可以比较准确地测量磨牙牙齿操作长度。AIM:To evaluate and analyze the accuracy of a new apex locator-ProPex in molar working length measurement. METHODS:Three hundred and eighty three root canals from 116 patients( 130 molars) were divide into 3 groups:group A(91 root canals from 30 molars) which needed retreatment because of underfilling;group B (130 root canals from 46 molars) which required intentional pulpectomy because of restorative and fixed prosthetic reasons;group C ( 162 root canals from 54 molars) which was undergoing chronic apical periodontitis. Working length of each root canal was measured by ProPex, and instrumentation and obturation were performed according to the working length. RESULTS:The accuracy of ProPex in molar working length measurement in the 3 groups was 86.8% ,96.2% and 85.8%. CONCLUSION:ProPex is relatively accurate in molar working length measurement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30