极固宁^(TM)、Gluma与NaF治疗牙本质过敏症的临床疗效观察  

Comparative study of clinical desensitizing effect of Green Or^(TM), Gluma and NaF

作　　者：熊筱艳[1] 吴方丽[2] 郭芮[3] 王晨阳 

机构地区：[1]江西省萍乡市人民医院口腔科,主治医师江西337005 [2]解放军第二炮兵总医院口腔科,医师北京100088 [3]解放军总医院口腔科,硕士生北京100853 [4]河南郸城县人民医院口腔科,医师河南477150

出　　处：《中华老年口腔医学杂志》2005年第4期196-198,共3页Chinese Journal of Geriatric Dentistry

摘　　要：目的:比较极固宁TM、Gluma、NaF等3种方法治疗牙本质过敏症的临床疗效。方法:选择2003年4月至2004年4月,在本院口腔科门诊就诊的牙本质过敏症患者60例,采用Chiss软件随机分组,三组病例分别采用极固宁TM、Gluma、NaF行牙本质过敏的脱敏治疗。结果:三种方法即刻有效率分别为74.4%、87.5%和94.8%,除极固宁TM组和NaF两组外,组间差异不明显(P>0.05)。治疗1个月和6个月后,极固宁TM组疗效显著优于Gluma组(P<0.01)和NaF组(P<0.01)。治疗12个月,除极固宁TM组仍维持77.1%的有效率外,NaF组和Gluma组有效率分别下降到26.4%和43.6%,差异有显著性(P<0.01)。结论:三种方法治疗牙本质过敏症均有较好的即刻疗效,但仅极固宁TM组远期疗效较好。Objective： To compare the clinical effect of three different desensitizing regents： Green Or^TM, Gluma and NaF. Methods： 60 patients visiting our dental department were randomly divided into three groups, which were treated by Green Or^TM, Gluma and NaF respectively. Clinical desensitizing effect was evaluated immediately, 1 month, six months and 12 months post treatment. Results： The immediate desensitizing effective rate of three regents was 74.4%, 87.5% and 94.8% respectively（P〈0.01）. Effective rate of Or^TM treatment group kept on 77.1% after 12 month of treatment. But the rate in Gluma group and NaF group reduced to 43.6% and 26.4%. Conclusions： The results suggest that all of the three desensitizers had certain desensitive effect clinically. Green OrTM showed the best prolonged healing effect.

关 键 词：牙本质过敏症 极固宁^TM Gluma脱敏荆 NaF糊剂 

分 类 号：R781.2[医药卫生—口腔医学]