《文选》六臣注的文体论与《文心雕龙》异同  

SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN STYLISTICS IN NOTES TO WEN XUAN BY SIX OFFICIALS AND WEN XIN DIAO LONG

作　　者：胡大雷[1] 

机构地区：[1]广西师范大学中文系,广西桂林541004

出　　处：《广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2005年第4期68-70,共3页Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"<文选>分类研究"(01BZW015)

摘　　要：唐时有李善及五臣给《文选》作注,其注在文体下及文体的类别下、在文章题目下、在作者名下有文体论述说。而《文心雕龙》是当时文体论的集大成者,《文选》注的文体论述说,或与《文心雕龙》有相同、相似之处而又繁衍出新的内容,或与《文心雕龙》有不同之处,或有《文心雕龙》未述者,从比较中可见《文选》六臣注的功能与崇尚。In the Tang Dynasty, Li Shan and the other five officials gave notes to Wen Xuan, in which they dealt with stylistics whereas Wen Xin Diao Long was a great work on stylistics at the time. The stylistics in the notes to Wen Xuan could be identical or similar to that in Wen Xin Diao Long. Moreover, it procreated something new which was different from Wen Xin Diao Long or not included in it. By comparison, we could see the functions and merits of Notes to Wen Xuan by the said six officials.

关 键 词：文选 文心雕龙 文体论 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]