检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]云南师范大学教育科学与管理学院,云南昆明650092 [2]昆明大学电技系,云南昆明650118
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2005年第4期432-433,436,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:云南省教育厅科学研究项目(项目号:042731G)
摘 要:目的:了解大学生对挫折的应对方式特点以及与自我复原的关联。方法:采用大学生应对方式问卷(CP)与自我复原量表(ER89)对319名1-4年级大学生进行测查。结果:大学生对挫折的应对方式依次主要为问题解决、转移、忍耐、求助、压抑、逃避、幻想、抱怨和退缩。传统家庭大学生比核心家庭大学生更多使用问题解决应对而较少采用逃避应对,男生比女生更多采用问题解决和压抑应对而较少采用抱怨和逃避应对。四年级学生比其他年级学生更多使用逃避和压抑应对。自我复原均分与问题解决、求助、忍耐呈显著正相关,与逃避、退缩、压抑呈显著负相关,与幻想呈轻度负相关。结论:家庭生活环境及性别对于应对方式有一定影响,积极应对方式有助于自我复原。Objective: To understand characteristics of coping styles and their relationship with ego-resiliency. Methods- 319 university students from grade 1-4 were surveyed by CP and ER89. Results: ①The main coping styles to frustration were respectively found as follows: problem solving, shifting, tolerance, help-seeking, oppressing, escaping, fantasy, complaining, and withdrawal; ②Students from traditional families had significantly higher scores of problem solving but lower scores of escaping than those of nuclear families; ③Males had significantly higher scores of problem solving and oppressing but lower scores of complaining and escaping styles than females; ④Significant higher scores of escaping and oppressing were found of the 4^th grade than others; ⑤The mean scores of problem solving, help-seeking and tolerance were positively correlated with mean score of ER89, while the mean scores of escaping, withdrawal, oppressing and fantasy were negatively correlated with the mean scores of ER89. Conclusion: The factors of family living condition and gender affected student's coping styles to some extent, and positive coping styles benefited ego resiliency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222