检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京航空航天大学电子信息工程学院,北京100083
出 处:《计算机工程与设计》2005年第11期2989-2991,2997,共4页Computer Engineering and Design
摘 要:MPLS被认为是下一代IP骨干网络技术,它的出现为流量工程的应用带来了有力的技术支持,同时也能应用于提供服务质量保证和构建虚拟网。作为两种支持MPLS流量工程的信令技术,CR-LDP和RSVP-TE有着各自的优缺点。首先介绍了这两种信令技术的基本原理和技术特点,然后对它们在支持的服务模型、协议的可靠性、适应性、扩展性等方面进行了比较,最后指出了这两种信令技术综合应用的研究方向。MPLS is regarded as the core of the next generation IP network. Its emergence provides strong technical support for traffic engineering. It can also be applied in supporting QoS and VPN constuction. CR-LDP and RSVP-TE are two signaling protocols which are designed to support MPLS. But each coin has two sides, so it is with CR-LDP and RSVP-TE. First, the signaling procedures of the two signaling protocols were investigated, and then the adaptability, extension and reliability were analyzed and compared. At last, some future works were proposed to make best use of the two signaling protocols integratively.
关 键 词:多协议标记转换 流量工程 CR-LDP RSVP-TE
分 类 号:TP393[自动化与计算机技术—计算机应用技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.21.55.224