修正达尔文理论是发展科学,不是反对科学  

Amending the Darwinism is an advancement of science

作　　者：王妍平[1] 金新政[1] 

机构地区：[1]华中科技大学同济医学院,湖北武汉430030

出　　处：《卫生软科学》2005年第6期388-390,共3页Soft Science of Health

摘　　要：ID运动没有全盘的否定达尔文主义,也不否定进化现象的存在,而是批评达尔文及其追随者把自然选择和随机突变作为进化现象最主要的、甚至唯一的根源。实践是检验真理的标准,在化石发现和科学研究的证据面前纠正错误是在发展科学,而固步自封才是反对科学的进步。The ID movement neither completely denied Darwinism, nor denied the existence of evolution, however, it mostly criticized Darwin and his adherents regard natural selection and random mutation as the uppermost and only root of evolution. Practice is the standard of testing the truth. Putting right in the face of the discovery of fossil and evidence of scientific research is to develop science comparing to isolating oneself.

关 键 词：智能设计 达尔文主义 自然选择 随机突变 

分 类 号：G201[文化科学—传播学] Q111.2[生物学—普通生物学]